<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Arise Bharat&#039;s Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arisebharat.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arisebharat.com</link>
	<description>Connecting Youth to Bharat&#039;s Roots</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 07:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Denim Jeans &#8211; Rationality, Comfort and Fashion by arisebharat</title>
		<link>http://arisebharat.com/2012/05/28/denim-jeans-rationality-comfort-and-fashion/#comment-2113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arisebharat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 07:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arisebharat.com/?p=817#comment-2113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure. You need not agree with the view point.:)  But just FYI, Vimal put all its energy on Polysters. Reliance promoted the polyster fabric over cottons.. :) and since you do mention the ads, kindly do make a count on any day about the huge hoardings that stare at your face of Levis, Lee, Wrangler etc..spread across so many cities.. Also do make an dispassionate analysis of this trend. Its definitely not relegated only to AC roomed offices, colleges are full of jean clad youth. This is not a fatwa against jeans. :) . The issue that is bothering is that an unclean clothing habit is being adopted as modernity on such a wide scale. BTW, if you are a jean loving person....keep wearing.. Just remember to wash it more frequently :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure. You need not agree with the view point.:)  But just FYI, Vimal put all its energy on Polysters. Reliance promoted the polyster fabric over cottons.. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  and since you do mention the ads, kindly do make a count on any day about the huge hoardings that stare at your face of Levis, Lee, Wrangler etc..spread across so many cities.. Also do make an dispassionate analysis of this trend. Its definitely not relegated only to AC roomed offices, colleges are full of jean clad youth. This is not a fatwa against jeans. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  . The issue that is bothering is that an unclean clothing habit is being adopted as modernity on such a wide scale. BTW, if you are a jean loving person&#8230;.keep wearing.. Just remember to wash it more frequently <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Denim Jeans &#8211; Rationality, Comfort and Fashion by Ratnakar Kulkarni</title>
		<link>http://arisebharat.com/2012/05/28/denim-jeans-rationality-comfort-and-fashion/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratnakar Kulkarni]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 19:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arisebharat.com/?p=817#comment-2112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I apologize for Jumping the gun, but I still do not agree with your view point. &quot; owing to the marketing blitz of US and Europe, the brands of denim overtook the fine cottons in daily use&quot;. The marketing that is done for cotton wears is far more than that of Jeans(compare the number of ads that you see for Vimal and other similar clothing to that of Jeans) coming to the comfort part Denim is mostly worn by people who spend most of their time in air conditioned offices if you look at the construction workers or civil engineers they mostly prefer cotton clothing. Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize for Jumping the gun, but I still do not agree with your view point. &#8221; owing to the marketing blitz of US and Europe, the brands of denim overtook the fine cottons in daily use&#8221;. The marketing that is done for cotton wears is far more than that of Jeans(compare the number of ads that you see for Vimal and other similar clothing to that of Jeans) coming to the comfort part Denim is mostly worn by people who spend most of their time in air conditioned offices if you look at the construction workers or civil engineers they mostly prefer cotton clothing. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Denim Jeans &#8211; Rationality, Comfort and Fashion by arisebharat</title>
		<link>http://arisebharat.com/2012/05/28/denim-jeans-rationality-comfort-and-fashion/#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arisebharat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 18:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arisebharat.com/?p=817#comment-2111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Ratnakarji,
Firstly, it is not a hatred towards anything. Why should an analysis of a trend be perceived as hate. Any trend can and must be analysed from our viewpoint. Secondly, just because something is Indian,. it does not become great and just because something comes from the West, it does not become bad. 

An alternate to a Coca Cola is not an Indian cola. What needs to be assessed is whether the cola itself is good for us. An alternate to western whiskey is not the promotion of Indian whiskey. Those comfortable with drinking whiskey Or cola are free to do so. Similarly those seeking to understand what makes a person drink whiskey and whether it is good for the nation are free too,arent they :). Bharatiyas have been great at proportion without going overboard with trends and therefore it would not surprise me if you found that Indians dyes were used worldover . In fact they must, have since the concept of dyes were invented in India. 

Bharatiyas exported a lot of stuff which are suitable for other parts of the world but may not be used in Bharat itself. As the great Tagore put it&quot; Each nation has its own question paper and we must answer it accordingly&quot;. What is good for one nation may not be good for another and the whole paradigm of modernity needs a thorough overhaul.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ratnakarji,<br />
Firstly, it is not a hatred towards anything. Why should an analysis of a trend be perceived as hate. Any trend can and must be analysed from our viewpoint. Secondly, just because something is Indian,. it does not become great and just because something comes from the West, it does not become bad. </p>
<p>An alternate to a Coca Cola is not an Indian cola. What needs to be assessed is whether the cola itself is good for us. An alternate to western whiskey is not the promotion of Indian whiskey. Those comfortable with drinking whiskey Or cola are free to do so. Similarly those seeking to understand what makes a person drink whiskey and whether it is good for the nation are free too,arent they <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Bharatiyas have been great at proportion without going overboard with trends and therefore it would not surprise me if you found that Indians dyes were used worldover . In fact they must, have since the concept of dyes were invented in India. </p>
<p>Bharatiyas exported a lot of stuff which are suitable for other parts of the world but may not be used in Bharat itself. As the great Tagore put it&#8221; Each nation has its own question paper and we must answer it accordingly&#8221;. What is good for one nation may not be good for another and the whole paradigm of modernity needs a thorough overhaul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Denim Jeans &#8211; Rationality, Comfort and Fashion by Ratnakar Kulkarni</title>
		<link>http://arisebharat.com/2012/05/28/denim-jeans-rationality-comfort-and-fashion/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratnakar Kulkarni]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 16:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arisebharat.com/?p=817#comment-2110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do not understand this hatred towards Jeans, there are accounts that the Jeans(denims) were first used in India(I am unable to find the link) also the dye used in the earlier Jeans manufactured in west was from India&#039;s indigo. Should we hate anything and everything from west ? What is wrong when someone claims that he/she is comfortable in Jeans? may be that person is really comfortable in Jeans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not understand this hatred towards Jeans, there are accounts that the Jeans(denims) were first used in India(I am unable to find the link) also the dye used in the earlier Jeans manufactured in west was from India&#8217;s indigo. Should we hate anything and everything from west ? What is wrong when someone claims that he/she is comfortable in Jeans? may be that person is really comfortable in Jeans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mattur &#8211; Sanskrit Village by Ramchandra</title>
		<link>http://arisebharat.com/2010/01/03/mattur-sanskrit-village/#comment-2107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramchandra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arisebharat.wordpress.com/?p=279#comment-2107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice work Rajatji]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work Rajatji</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Kalki the only hope? &#8211; S.Gurumurthy by Mahesh</title>
		<link>http://arisebharat.com/2012/05/24/is-kalki-the-only-hope-s-gurumurthy/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arisebharat.com/?p=807#comment-2105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great Column ..These will help us to think more deeper and deeper and help full to educate the people. thanks to the Admin of the block]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Column ..These will help us to think more deeper and deeper and help full to educate the people. thanks to the Admin of the block</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Supreme Court Insults Hindus by referring Radha-Krishna as premarital sex by Tushar Sharma</title>
		<link>http://arisebharat.com/2010/03/29/supreme-court-insults-hindus-by-referring-radha-krishna-premarital-sex/#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tushar Sharma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 07:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arisebharat.wordpress.com/2010/03/29/supreme-court-insults-hindus-by-referring-radha-krishna-premarital-sex/#comment-2100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Please refine your knowledge with truth. Shri Krishna married only one woman, Rukmani. An Arya man (true Follower of Vedas), can not marry more then one woman (Although, some exceptions of it are in Vedas but these are fully logical. For detailed information, please explore Vedas).

To know the truth about Shri Krishna, Please follow the link:

http://www.satyavidya.org/component/content/article/50-awakening-of-nation/159-lord-krishna-an-enlightening-personality

Shri Krishna is considered as Avatar. Avatar, as a material, is a human body used by God to publish some of his unlimited powers to re-establish truthful knowledge among the human beings. Avatar is supposed to teach humans the ideal way of leaving and hence, is worth of much respect. Avatar is a physical expression of Almighty, One, and unseen God.
And even after this explanation, if someone is considering Avatar as a born of God Himself in a body like an ordinary man, then one needs deep meditation before understanding almighty Gods’ power . Don’t say to me that the greatest creator God is not able to create an Avatar body to reveal his powers and he can only insert a soul in a human body. (If you don’t know the difference between God and souls, please read Gita in the light of Vedas.)

One Obvious Question: If Vedas are considered as the source of true knowledge why don’t they tell about Avatars (Like Shri ram and Shri Krishna) directly?
Answer: 
1. Vedas are very first books which are reveled for human being before any Avatar.
2. These books are supposed to provide true knowledge about Almighty God and the way to get His all blessings only.
3. Future can be predicted but can not be confirmed as it depends on your Karmas. If God had written the information about Avtars in Vedas, it would be against His philosophy about future.

All information about Shri Krishna (or any Other Avatar) which are against Vedas must be rejected forcefully. 

Vedas are the basics of our religious and social values. Every statement from our Religious books must be justified from Vedas values. If it is contradictory to Vedas then it must be rejected. We all know, Indian religious books had been modified at many places by many anti-Hindus and many idiot illiterate pundits even. And, that false knowledge had been circulated since middle age (or may be before of that, if someone has some research on this, please share with me. Thanks in advance!!!). I don’t oppose any book completely, but I reject every statement in any book which is against Vedas. Even we know, in Vedas also, a few statements had added.  Many thanks to Scholar Dayanand Saraswati, who found them and rejected on the basis of Sanskrit grammar and logical grounds (Please read his literatures for those logics) .At least, it is a common sense if some sentence is opposite to other sentences which already have been proven logically then that sentence must be wrong. (FYI. I am not his blind follower. Again, Vedas don’t allow following any one blindly!!!).

As per Mahabharata, as we know, there is nothing about Radha. And if Radha had been at that time and she had had one sided love with Shri Krishna and had accepted Him as Her Husband by heart (the same way as Savitri accepted Satyavan as her Husband just after having conversations with him) what’s wrong if she remained unmarried whole life with this strong believe that she can’t accept any other man as she already considered Herself for Shri Krishna. This only gives us the proof of Her pure feelings and thus must be highly respectable among all human kinds. Avatars are such ideal personally, anyone with pure heart will affectionate with them, so someone, how lived with them… how could be they be an exception!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Please refine your knowledge with truth. Shri Krishna married only one woman, Rukmani. An Arya man (true Follower of Vedas), can not marry more then one woman (Although, some exceptions of it are in Vedas but these are fully logical. For detailed information, please explore Vedas).</p>
<p>To know the truth about Shri Krishna, Please follow the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.satyavidya.org/component/content/article/50-awakening-of-nation/159-lord-krishna-an-enlightening-personality" rel="nofollow">http://www.satyavidya.org/component/content/article/50-awakening-of-nation/159-lord-krishna-an-enlightening-personality</a></p>
<p>Shri Krishna is considered as Avatar. Avatar, as a material, is a human body used by God to publish some of his unlimited powers to re-establish truthful knowledge among the human beings. Avatar is supposed to teach humans the ideal way of leaving and hence, is worth of much respect. Avatar is a physical expression of Almighty, One, and unseen God.<br />
And even after this explanation, if someone is considering Avatar as a born of God Himself in a body like an ordinary man, then one needs deep meditation before understanding almighty Gods’ power . Don’t say to me that the greatest creator God is not able to create an Avatar body to reveal his powers and he can only insert a soul in a human body. (If you don’t know the difference between God and souls, please read Gita in the light of Vedas.)</p>
<p>One Obvious Question: If Vedas are considered as the source of true knowledge why don’t they tell about Avatars (Like Shri ram and Shri Krishna) directly?<br />
Answer:<br />
1. Vedas are very first books which are reveled for human being before any Avatar.<br />
2. These books are supposed to provide true knowledge about Almighty God and the way to get His all blessings only.<br />
3. Future can be predicted but can not be confirmed as it depends on your Karmas. If God had written the information about Avtars in Vedas, it would be against His philosophy about future.</p>
<p>All information about Shri Krishna (or any Other Avatar) which are against Vedas must be rejected forcefully. </p>
<p>Vedas are the basics of our religious and social values. Every statement from our Religious books must be justified from Vedas values. If it is contradictory to Vedas then it must be rejected. We all know, Indian religious books had been modified at many places by many anti-Hindus and many idiot illiterate pundits even. And, that false knowledge had been circulated since middle age (or may be before of that, if someone has some research on this, please share with me. Thanks in advance!!!). I don’t oppose any book completely, but I reject every statement in any book which is against Vedas. Even we know, in Vedas also, a few statements had added.  Many thanks to Scholar Dayanand Saraswati, who found them and rejected on the basis of Sanskrit grammar and logical grounds (Please read his literatures for those logics) .At least, it is a common sense if some sentence is opposite to other sentences which already have been proven logically then that sentence must be wrong. (FYI. I am not his blind follower. Again, Vedas don’t allow following any one blindly!!!).</p>
<p>As per Mahabharata, as we know, there is nothing about Radha. And if Radha had been at that time and she had had one sided love with Shri Krishna and had accepted Him as Her Husband by heart (the same way as Savitri accepted Satyavan as her Husband just after having conversations with him) what’s wrong if she remained unmarried whole life with this strong believe that she can’t accept any other man as she already considered Herself for Shri Krishna. This only gives us the proof of Her pure feelings and thus must be highly respectable among all human kinds. Avatars are such ideal personally, anyone with pure heart will affectionate with them, so someone, how lived with them… how could be they be an exception!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Regional issues should not precede over National interest: Dr Swamy at India Foundation Lecture by Devendra</title>
		<link>http://arisebharat.com/2012/05/15/regional-issues-should-not-precede-over-national-interest-dr-swamy-at-india-foundation-lecture/#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Devendra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 11:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arisebharat.com/?p=808#comment-2099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[वास्तविकता तो यह है की आज श्री लंका की सरकार खुद  तमिल  अतंकवादियो की तरह व्यवहार कर रही है और भारत की चुप्पी न केवल भारतीय तमिलो को भारत के विरुध कर रही है, बल्कि ये श्री लंका के दुसाहस को भी बड़ा रही है. भारत को यहाँ श्री लंका की गलतियों से आखो को मुंदने के बजाय उसे कड़ा सन्देश देना चाहिए, क्योकि यहाँ श्री लंका ही गलत है]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>वास्तविकता तो यह है की आज श्री लंका की सरकार खुद  तमिल  अतंकवादियो की तरह व्यवहार कर रही है और भारत की चुप्पी न केवल भारतीय तमिलो को भारत के विरुध कर रही है, बल्कि ये श्री लंका के दुसाहस को भी बड़ा रही है. भारत को यहाँ श्री लंका की गलतियों से आखो को मुंदने के बजाय उसे कड़ा सन्देश देना चाहिए, क्योकि यहाँ श्री लंका ही गलत है</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Supreme Court Insults Hindus by referring Radha-Krishna as premarital sex by well wisher</title>
		<link>http://arisebharat.com/2010/03/29/supreme-court-insults-hindus-by-referring-radha-krishna-premarital-sex/#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[well wisher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 18:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arisebharat.wordpress.com/2010/03/29/supreme-court-insults-hindus-by-referring-radha-krishna-premarital-sex/#comment-2098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear priya ,

rise above the feeling of sex , lust and fear .
Lord Krishna is termed as triloki nath or the owner of the three world , namely heaven earth and hell.

Findings of ram steu in palk strait , diging up of indus valley civilization in pakistan where stone were found to be in christined glass form ,indicate something near to war where heat and pressure created was so high that nothing could have turned stone except explosions to the tune of nuclear bomb (i.e. brahmatra)

If u want to know  about hinduism then have u ever heard the name of saint Agustiya ?? he has written about every human being whpo is going to take birth on planet earth  ,about everyone&#039; janma (don&#039;t believe me go and search for Naadi Atrology)

And still don&#039;t wanna believe me OK , no probs , but u cannot ignore Law Of Karma !!

So called prophet muhammad of islam married a 6yr old girl, had sex with her when she was 9yr old,(paedophile)

He used to get 1/5th of war booty , he married his daughter in law,what kind of religion do u call this???

Think logically !! slavery is legal in islam ,having sex with captured woman in war is halal (means legal ) in islam.

contract marriages for 1 day ,2 or 10 day is legal in islam (misyar and muttah ) It is nothing but legalized form of prostitution.

Do u know by the way that it is written in so called holy quran that if a man  wants sex with  his wife the lady cannot ignore it .&quot; A wife is tilth for his man &quot; -Holy Quran.
Still don&#039;t believe me go and search for it.

Ya and the best  part ,all muslim men if they go to heaven they will get 72 virgins ,yeah virgins to have sex .It is also there in quran go and read it ..

And sorry if u r a muslim women u will only get to see ur husband sleeping with those woman .!!

Whereas Hinduism Bhuddism teaches about MOKSHA (i.e freedom from the cycle of birth and death ,what lord budha ,mahavira have already attained.)

we don&#039;t want criticize anyone from any religion nor we want to convert anyone but when people start saying   &quot;Holier Than Thou&quot; means my religion is better than yours or u r following something wrong,then the problem arises.



Judge ur self !! a religion teaching sex and slavery or a religion teaching MOKSHA  and Law Of KARMA!!
JAI SHREE RAM JAI HANUMAN !!JAI SHREE KRISHNA !! HAR HAR MAHADEV !!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear priya ,</p>
<p>rise above the feeling of sex , lust and fear .<br />
Lord Krishna is termed as triloki nath or the owner of the three world , namely heaven earth and hell.</p>
<p>Findings of ram steu in palk strait , diging up of indus valley civilization in pakistan where stone were found to be in christined glass form ,indicate something near to war where heat and pressure created was so high that nothing could have turned stone except explosions to the tune of nuclear bomb (i.e. brahmatra)</p>
<p>If u want to know  about hinduism then have u ever heard the name of saint Agustiya ?? he has written about every human being whpo is going to take birth on planet earth  ,about everyone&#8217; janma (don&#8217;t believe me go and search for Naadi Atrology)</p>
<p>And still don&#8217;t wanna believe me OK , no probs , but u cannot ignore Law Of Karma !!</p>
<p>So called prophet muhammad of islam married a 6yr old girl, had sex with her when she was 9yr old,(paedophile)</p>
<p>He used to get 1/5th of war booty , he married his daughter in law,what kind of religion do u call this???</p>
<p>Think logically !! slavery is legal in islam ,having sex with captured woman in war is halal (means legal ) in islam.</p>
<p>contract marriages for 1 day ,2 or 10 day is legal in islam (misyar and muttah ) It is nothing but legalized form of prostitution.</p>
<p>Do u know by the way that it is written in so called holy quran that if a man  wants sex with  his wife the lady cannot ignore it .&#8221; A wife is tilth for his man &#8221; -Holy Quran.<br />
Still don&#8217;t believe me go and search for it.</p>
<p>Ya and the best  part ,all muslim men if they go to heaven they will get 72 virgins ,yeah virgins to have sex .It is also there in quran go and read it ..</p>
<p>And sorry if u r a muslim women u will only get to see ur husband sleeping with those woman .!!</p>
<p>Whereas Hinduism Bhuddism teaches about MOKSHA (i.e freedom from the cycle of birth and death ,what lord budha ,mahavira have already attained.)</p>
<p>we don&#8217;t want criticize anyone from any religion nor we want to convert anyone but when people start saying   &#8220;Holier Than Thou&#8221; means my religion is better than yours or u r following something wrong,then the problem arises.</p>
<p>Judge ur self !! a religion teaching sex and slavery or a religion teaching MOKSHA  and Law Of KARMA!!<br />
JAI SHREE RAM JAI HANUMAN !!JAI SHREE KRISHNA !! HAR HAR MAHADEV !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hindu Temple Desecrated- Violence in Saidabad, Hyderabad by Atul Thakur</title>
		<link>http://arisebharat.com/2012/04/08/hindu-temple-desecrated-violence-in-saidabad-hyderabad/#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atul Thakur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 19:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arisebharat.com/?p=794#comment-2090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Kaleemuddin,
                              I am not stuck anywhere. I am pointing out that we cannot talk abt other issues when the issue is desecration of the temple.  Let me cover a topic that is postive. Inspite of ure tone of writing the email,  I really liked that u condemmed the happenings in Kashmir or Pakistan and I assume the temple desecration too.. I would really hope that there are more Muslims in India who would stand up and condem such dispicable acts and help the police to catch the guilty. 
              Now let us look at the facts. Muslims in India an nearly doubled in population. They r free to practise their religion and do business in India. The movie industry is a good example of it. Kashmir was doing very well until Pakistan started sending their terrorists to Kashmir and started terrorising the people there.  On the other side Hindus are being harassed in pakistan and Bangla Desh, forced to convert.. So what grounds do u have to discredit the saffron clothes ? None. If muslims were being harassed and pushed out of India then Muslims would not do as well in India !! Simple fact.  Please do not discredit saffron clothes as that is Holy in our religion.  So there is no agenda to put Muslims down. If there was then the muslims would be forced out of India to Pakistan or to Bangla Desh.  
                So u r watching the wrong media coverage !!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Kaleemuddin,<br />
                              I am not stuck anywhere. I am pointing out that we cannot talk abt other issues when the issue is desecration of the temple.  Let me cover a topic that is postive. Inspite of ure tone of writing the email,  I really liked that u condemmed the happenings in Kashmir or Pakistan and I assume the temple desecration too.. I would really hope that there are more Muslims in India who would stand up and condem such dispicable acts and help the police to catch the guilty.<br />
              Now let us look at the facts. Muslims in India an nearly doubled in population. They r free to practise their religion and do business in India. The movie industry is a good example of it. Kashmir was doing very well until Pakistan started sending their terrorists to Kashmir and started terrorising the people there.  On the other side Hindus are being harassed in pakistan and Bangla Desh, forced to convert.. So what grounds do u have to discredit the saffron clothes ? None. If muslims were being harassed and pushed out of India then Muslims would not do as well in India !! Simple fact.  Please do not discredit saffron clothes as that is Holy in our religion.  So there is no agenda to put Muslims down. If there was then the muslims would be forced out of India to Pakistan or to Bangla Desh.<br />
                So u r watching the wrong media coverage !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

