Author Archives: arisebharat



  • By M.S.Golwalkar ( Guruji Golwalkar ) 


This is an invaluable discourse delivered by the late Shri Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar, the second Sarsanghchalak of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangha, who we affectionately know as Shri Guruji.

Many Swayamsevaks introduce themselves by saying, “I am an Ordinary Swayamsevek.” Taking clue from this type of introduction, Shri Guruji has ably elaborated all salient features of the R.S.S. in this small discourse.

Narrating many events from the life of Dr. Hedgewar, the founder Sarsanghchalak of the R.S.S., Shri Guruji has explained in a very simple, lucid and organised style as to how a Swayamsevak should conduct himself in society, how to run the Sangh shakha, how to Interweave relation between the Shakha and the people living around it. He has also explained, in detail, why our character should be spotlessly clean and how our behaviour be loving and full of affection.

Ordinary Swayamsevak of the R. S. S. is not “ordinary” in the sense he describes himself to be. There is an altogether distinct “extraordinariness” in him. It is that extraordinariness of which he is not even aware, leave alone being proud of it. But Shri Guruji says that it is a matter of prestige to be an ordinary Swayamsevak. No other thing can be more respectable and prestigious than this. Post and power are merely the system peculiarities. Where as to be a Swayamasevak is its very foundation.

This discourse contains one more fundamental aspect. That is: we have to organise the entire Hindu society. Establishing small organisation within the Hindu society is not our objective. But our target is to organise the Hindu society in its entirety. Therefore we must have a total picture of society in our view. It is not that each and every individual of the society will attend the Shakha. But we must see to it that all those who dwell in cities, villages and in forests are considered as our brothers; that we maintain continuous and live relations with them, and that these relations be cordial, friendly, sportive as well as full of mutual trust and co-operation. Shri Guruji says, ” There must be sufficient number of branches, spread all over the nation, functioning continuously and having necessary number of Swayamsevaks in them for achieving this purpose” This responsibility rests with ordinary Swayammsevaks and it is a life-long mission. According to Shri Guruji such an ordinary Swayamsevak enjoys unusual and exceptional high esteem. It is even more true now than it was at that time. The Sangh is known to the people more by its ordinary Swayamsevaks than by its philosophy, well-disciplined programmes or its route-marches. Most effective and best means of identifying the R.S.S. is its Swayamsevak and his conduct. If at all the form and character of the Sangh has to have proper influence on society, it could only be through the behaviour of an ordinary Swayamsevak. It is post of such an immense responsibility. Shri Guruji expects that every Swayamsevak should understand this responsibility. This itself is a master key to understand the extraordinariness of an ordinary. I have no doubt that this discourse will help all Swayamsevaks to Introspect.



During my tours, while talking to the Swayamsevaks, I generally ask them to introduce themselves. In reply, many of them say, “I am an ordinary Swayamsevak.” Vary often, the intention behind saying so is that they do not have any specific organizational responsibility of the Sangh activities. It looks as though their responsibility is to conduct themselves in such a way that their Mukhya Shikshak or Shikshak would be required to undertake special efforts for them. For example, they would remain absent for the Shakha so that these office bearers would come to their house and would call them! So, the Implied meaning is that, as though, it is their responsibility to give those office-bearers an opportunity to do their job more effectively!

“Swayamsevak” : A Matter of Pride :

Now, the term “Ordinary Swayamsevak” is very meaningful because all of us are ordinary Swayamsevaks. Who possesses extra-ordinariness amongst us? People call me the chief of the R.S.S. What sort of uncommonness or extra-ordinariness do I possess? It is true, I have a well grown beard. But if you don”t shave everyday, your beard would also grow! What is extra¬ordinary about it?   I know many of us present here are doing various experiments in this regard! But from that point of view also, there is nothing particular about me.

I recollect an old episode. It is about the founding father of the R.S.S. Once he appealed to his Swayamsevak brethren: “Please develop some one to take up the responsibility of the Sarsanghachalak so that I can hand over this responsibility to him and exert myself as an ordinary Swayamsevak. I have some ideas of how an ordinary Swayamsevak should be. I have some hopes and aspirations from him. I would like to conduct myself accordingly and set an example before my Swayamsevak-brothers working with me”. It means, he aspired to become an ordinary Swayamsevak. But the circumstances did not allow him to do so. He was constrained to continue as the chief of the R.S.S. The question is, why did he aspire to be so? What made him think like that? The only answer is, it is a matter of great pride and prestige in our organization to be an ordinary Swayamsevak.

Time and again, I have to move in the society and undertake journeys across the country for the organizational work. During my travel, if somebody asks me, “What do you consider as the most prestigious thing in your life that you would be proud of?” Then I would like say, “Being an ordinary Swayamsevak of R.S.S.” There cannot be any greater thing to be proud of. I am educated and have earned some degrees. I have taught some people and delivered speeches at many places. Some people come and garland me, some of them even prostrate before me. I receive more namaskars perhaps because of my ascetic dress! But none of these things gives me any sense of elation. Many great people come and meet me.  They include foreigners also.  Many holy saints and sanyasins in the field of religion meet me. I always cherish their blessings. Politicians and educationists also come and meet me. They place various problems before me and seek my advice. It cannot be denied that all those things are capable of invoking a sense of pride in the heart. But I have never considered them as worthy of pride. The only thing worthy of pride is, “Due to divine coincidence, I have been a Sangh Swayamsevak.”

So, it is needless to say that no other thing is more respectable and loftier than being a Swayamsevak. If it is so, you may think, what about all those office-bearers ranging from the Sarsanghachalak to a Gatnayak? We have evolved a system for the conduct of our activities, since no organization can function without a system. And as we have to run the organization, we have devised a system. As a Swayamsevak, every one of us has been assigned a specific responsibility within the wider framework of that system. So, he is a Swayamsevak having a responsibility assigned to him. But all the same, the most important and pride-worthy thing in his life is the fact that he is basically a Swayamsevak, irrespective of whatever office he is holding within the system.

So, when I say I am an ordinary Swayamsevak, I must bear in my mind the sense of responsibility associated with it. It is really a great responsibility. Society is also watching us as a Swayamsevak. People have great many expectations from us. We also think that they should have those expectations from us and by fulfilling them, we should be able to live up to their expectations and prove to be worthy of them.

Minimum Shakha Systems :

So, what are the things in general that we as Swayamsevaks should pay attention to? Let us first think about the Shakha.

1)Shakha should be held everyday.2) It must be held on time.3) A variety of programmes should be conducted in the Shakha.4) An atmosphere of sportsman-spirit, love, affection and purity should prevail among all the Swayamsevaks.5) We must develop the urge and desire in our heart to become clearer and stronger in our goal-realization through the process of discussion and deliberation among ourselves.6) We must pronounce our Prayer correctly, collectively and with all solemnity, faith and  understanding.7) Our holy Flag is a symbol of whatever is of utmost purity for us. We must salute it collectively and with all modesty.8) Sit together for sometime and discuss various matters. Find out as to who have not attended the Shakha that day and try to meet them before the next day.

All these are routine matters related to our daily Sangh Shakha, in which every Swayamsevak is expected to fully take part.

Responsibilities of a Swayamsevak:

1) What are the other do”s for the Swayamsevak? If any Shakha is to be held regularly and on time, one must start from his house or wherever he is, sufficiently in advance and reach the scheduled place of the Shakha at least a couple of minutes before time. Nobody should wait for somebody to come to take him to his Shakha. Perhaps somebody may come and call us as a matter of his duty. But it is not fair on our part to wait at home so that the caller is give an opportunity to perform his duty! This is the first lesson that all of us must bear in mind.

2)Then, one must think that he is the person who is interested in organizing the people, and not living in solitude. Then why should he not call all those Swayamsevaks staying nearby while going to the Shakha? It is just a matter of friendship. Is it necessary that one should have some specific responsibility for doing this simple thing? Is it necessary to be either a Mukhya Shishak or a Shikshak for doing the same? It is just a matter of true friendship that whenever any one goes for doing any good work,he urges his friends also to accompany him. One should reach the Shakha in a happy and gay mood, calling and accompanied by all those brother Swayamsevaks staying near his house or on his way. And this must happen in a very natural manner.

3)Then, all programmes on the Sanghasthan should be conducted with full involvement and discipline of all Swayamsevaks and abiding by the stipulated rules and regulations. One should not get upset even if one has to over-exert himself for the same. Our programmes are meant for exertion only. By developing the habit of doing hard work alone, one can increase his capacity to undertake bigger tasks and complete them in a thorough manner. All our programmes are arranged from this point of view. Therefore, one must do them with the best of care and efforts.   It must be borne in mind that all these programmes carry manifold purpose with them. They create a spirit of fearlessness, self-confidence and valour in our mind; they weave us all in a common thread of discipline and make us realise within our heart and that we are an integral part of the Divine Power, manifested in the form of our Organisation. Therefore, we must study and practice all these programmes in the best possible manner.

4) Why should one feel like running away to home hurriedly and immediately after Prarthana, Dhwaja Pranam, Dhwajavataran and the dispersal order ‘Vikir’? In fact, one should not. If anyone is desirous of going away early or wandering elsewhere, It would only mean that he has developed a wrong tendency to “escape”, that he attended the Shakha unwillingly or under compulsion. Nobody attends Shakha under anybody”s pressure. No one should. It is always emphasised that one goes there voluntarily. If it is so, why should any one think of running away? One should feel like lingering there for some more time. All of us are bosom friends. Let us sit or stand together and chat for a while. Two things must be covered in our informal chat:

a) All those who attend Shakha regularly are our fellow brothers. We must collect information about those who attended and also about those who have not attended. It must be inquired as to why they did not attend,

b) Let us go to all those who did not attend the Shakha on that day and enquire why they could not come. Let us go in small groups and meet them. If they have any problems, let us think whether or not we can help them, solve them. If there is no problem as such, we must convince them in gentle terms that it is not fair to remain absent without proper reason.  They should be persuaded to the extent that they would take sufficient care not to miss the Shakha from the next day onwards.

Intellectual And Emotional Equipment

This is our minimum daily routine. As an ordinary Swayamsevak we must do all these things. We must also recapitulate some or other aspect of our goal and the sanctity of our motherland. Of course, this process has to be continued through several other supporting intellectual programmes after the Shakha-hour. Let us recall innumerable sacred places scattered all over Bharat, from the Himalayas to the seashore in the South. Some glorious aspects of our history or some great event stand behind every one of them. There are many historical places all around; let us recall them. Every historical place is associated with one or the other characteristics of some one or the other great man; let us remember them. Let us think collectively over the qualities reflected in that great man and ask ourselves whether or not those qualities are inculcated in us. Do we make efforts to develop those qualities within us? Do we just recall the name of Shivaji for name-sake? Now-a-day a great many people refer to the name of Shivaji with or without reason. Instead of that, his virtues must be imbibed within us. When we remember the name of Shivaji, a radiant and inspiring personality stands before our mind”s eye. His is an all Bharat figure symbolising the fiery spirit of freedom. He was an exceptionally great warrior who undertook the noble task of founding once again a prosperous, Dharma-based holy kingdom of Hindu prowess in Bharat. He was a man of high moral conduct and a versatile genius. His personality was extremely pure and full of national spirit. Do we assimilate these qualities within us? In this way, thinking about each and every great person, we should introspect what efforts have we made to develop our own qualities? If we have any undesirable traits within us, what efforts have we made to shed them off? Let us ponder over such matters, individually as well as collectively.

Neighbourly Duties:

In addition, we have to perform some other important duties as well. There will be many families near where we stay. It means, all of us together are neighbours to each other. So we have naturally some neighbourly duties towards them. This involves firstly knowing how they are carrying on their life and what are their problems. We must also know about their mental stresses and strains and should always be ready to help relieve them. This is what is expected as part of our neighbourly duty. Shutting the doors of our house from inside and sitting unconcerned is not good neighbourly behaviour, particularly when something goes wrong with our neighbour”s life. We cannot neglect him thinking that it is because of his misfortune that it is none of our concern whether he dies or survives. It is not only unneighbourly but inhuman, let alone failing to discharge our good neighbourly duty. So it behooves us to visit their houses, meet all of them, talk to them and make efforts to develop affectionate and cordial relations with them. It is also our duty to evoke similar feelings in their hearts also about us. They should all feel a sense of confidence about us that this person has a transparently clear and guileless love for us, that he is our true friend and would not let us down in our times of distress and that he would always be with us as a good neighbour and come to our help promptly. We must try to evolve our life-style in such a way that, on the basis of trust and confidence so generated, everyone in our neighbourhood would feel like being a member of a larger family. When we thus become successful in developing an atmosphere of mutual friendship, affection and trust among our neighbours, we will be able to draw from them active Swayamsevaks for the Sangh”s activities.

Mere Intellect fails to Win Hearts

Now, instead of reaching the hearts of people in this fashion, if somebody thinks that he is very intelligent and that he will be able to convince others by his intellectual arguments alone as to how the R.S.S. activities are good for the country and thereby induce them to join the Sangh, then he is committing a grave mistake. May be you are intelligent and capable of engaging people in debate, but they will not necessarily be convinced about the value or worth of our activities.

One of my friends told me that a particular gentleman had some doubts and reservations about the Sangh and that he had a desire to meet me and talk. He happened to be an old acquaintance of mine and also had attended the Shakha for sometime in the past. So I went to him and we discussed about the doubts he had in his mind, for nearly two hours. Of course, now-a-days I do not get so much of leisure time for such discussion. Because during those days neither the Sangh work was so widely spread (nor there were so many “wrangling’s” as they are today!) I could get enough time to go and meet friends. During the two hours of our discussion I tried to clear as many of his doubts as he possibly had and thus tried to satisfy him. But every time he used to say, “Guruji, what you say is correct, but….”, and he would raise the same questions again. I also tried to convince him and satisfy him by giving almost the same answers. Despite my best efforts, he used to say, “What you say is all right but…..” Finally I asked him, “My dear friend, how many “buts ” do you have? The more I try to pluck them out, the more they are growing! What is the matter, after all?” All this only means, it was not possible to convince him. Rational arguments would not “clear” any of his doubts. That also did not make him convinced so as to undertake Sangh work. Intellect has its own limitations. What can you do if the intellect cannot go beyond its own limitations?

Arguments Prove Counter Productive

In fact, arguments will only prove counter-productive. You will find no one joining the Sangh just because you have debated with him the merits of the issue and defeated him successfully in the arguments. If you think, that he would accept the defeat and say “All right gentleman, I join the R.S.S”. You will be badly disappointed if you make use of your intelligence in this way and show others that you are superior to them in intellect, do you think they would feel happy about it? Who would like to concede that God has given him less intelligence and that the other person is more intelligent than him? Nobody would like it. In fact, it is my experience that he would feel insulted and would keep himself away from you.

I had a friend of mine. Though our subjects were different, we were studying in the same class. He was very fond of indulging in arguments and debates. He was a well-read and much studied person. Therefore perhaps he had a great passion for debates.  I was also infected by his passion and we used to often enter into arguments. At times, he felt that he was on tenterhooks. A similar situation was repeated for three, four times. His friends started laughing at him and said, “You pose yourself pompously to be very intelligent wherever you go, but here you cannot make even a couple of cogent arguments.” He thought he was being ridiculed and thought it was all because he used to talk to me. So he started avoiding me, to this extent that if he saw me from the other side of road he would escape stealthily into a nearby bye lane and disappear! I saw that happening for a few times. And then, one day I went to him running and caught hold of him when he was escaping into a by lane. I said, “My dear friend, Why are you running away?” He replied, “I don”t want to talk to you because you make me a laughing stock in the presence of others. Who will talk to you only to get ridiculed and insulted?” Then I told him gently, “My dear fellow, you have a passion for debate and not I! I entered into arguments with you unwillingly, just to satisfy your thirst for the same. What can I do if you find yourself on tenterhooks in the process? However, it doesn”t matter. Let us now resolve that we will never enter into any arguments hereafter. Do you think it is fair to forsake our friendship just for satisfying our passion for debate? Friendship is more important than a battle of wits.” And thus I tried to pacify him. It only means that by engaging oneself in arguments in debate, one just gets alienated from the person and never comes close to him again.

Winning the Hearts

Then how do the people come to accept our propositions? Firstly, there are some people who are, as though, marked by God Himself for the Sangh”s work.
When somebody just goes to them and requests them to attend the Shakha or do some Sangh work, as if, the impressions they had accrued in their previous birth awaken instantly, they spontaneously respond and come forward to work with us as our colleagues. They do not need to be convinced about it at all. There are in fact a number of such people everywhere.

2)Some people think rationally and discerningly. They study the national state of affairs and are convinced that there is no other solution except the R.S.S. They come forward to do the Sangh work with a sense of duty towards the society,

3)Some people intensely desire to have friends, and since their desire is fulfilled in the Sangh, they join us in our work.

Watch out for the Motive

4)But there may also be some who may come due to some one or other kind of selfish motive. One day I saw one of my lawyer friends in the Shakha. Pretending myself to be a lawyer, I asked him, “How come you are present in the Shakha today?” He replied, “I have started thinking that I must join the R.S.S.” I queried, “What made you think like this? He said “Nothing very special”. But I smelt a rat in what he said. I thought I must dig out what was going on in his mind. Though he was senior to me in profession I thought I must get into his graces and so we exchanged many matters of various sorts, Later on, it struck me that there were some lawyer-Swayamsevaks who were assigned the responsibility of going to different villages in the Nagpur Taluka andDistrict and introducing the Sangh work there. Every week, on Saturdays and Sundays they were expected to go to those villages and make report of their activities on Thursday night in Nagpur and also finalise the plan of their visits and activities for the next week. Our lawyer friend also came to know of this touring. He also felt that because of this touring practice a lawyer Swayamsevak could get himself acquainted through out the district. Some or the other court cases of those places would also be there in the District Court. Naturally, all those who knew that lawyer Swayamsevak would approach him for the cases. So, he thought,” If I also join their group, some people might approach me also and my practice might flourish.” With that ulterior motive in mind he had started attending the Shakha! One day he himself confided to me saying, “People from all over the district come to Nagpur for their court cases. If I would get acquainted with them as a lawyer, they might come to me with their briefs and I could also get some cases.” I just remarked, “Your thinking is imperfect.”

Surprised, our lawyer friend asked, “What is lacking in my thinking?” I replied, “Since you are a Swayamsevak, they might be attracted to you with a feeling of intimacy and bring their cases to you. But due to that same feeling of intimacy they might not also pay you the fees!” Our friend stared at me, as if shocked, and asked, “Is that really so?” I just said, “See my own example.” When I told him to see my own example, he became thoroughly disillusioned that he would not gain anything. Needless to say, from the next day onwards he never turned up to the Shakha!

 Rouse People”s Trust in us

What then is the best way for making people -whatever their mental aptitudes- come close to us? How can a situation be created in which we can calmly explain to them the aims and activities of the Sangh? For that purpose, proper unison of minds needs to be established between both of us, i.e., the person to be persuaded and ourselves. True friendship has to be evolved between us so that both of us feel oneness of our hearts. Once that situation is created, commitment to the cause in our heart would also penetrate his heart. Only in this way, i.e., on the basis of true love only, we can bring each and every person into our fold. We can then create an urge in his mind to dedicate himself to our cause, so that we can utilise his services as our colleague. For that, we must ponder diligently about our own attitudes and behaviour.

This is the way to bring one and all into our fold. We should never be careless in this respect. Thus should be our natural attitude towards not only our neighbours but also towards all those who come in our contact in different contexts; may be they are students studying with us, colleagues in our office or our associates in any avocation. If we are engaged in business, similar feelings of oneness, faith and honour should be roused in their minds about us. And there by whatever deep conviction we have in our heart about the Sangh, it will naturally be reflected in their hearts as well.

All this we have to do by away of our duty as an “Ordinary Swayamsevak”. No extraordinary qualities are required for this. It is the work of every one of us. In short, what are the essential things required of us? They are: firstly, we must become worthy of people”s trust and confidence. Secondly, we should always be ready to exert for their sake and that too willingly, voluntarily. It should neither be done casually nor by way of mere, formal duty. It should also be done in the spirit of oneness in our relationship with each other.

Put up Examples of Flawless Character

These are two minimum things. In addition, the third thing we are required do is: we have to cultivate flawless conduct in ourselves. Thereby alone we can arouse faith for the Sangh work in their hearts. Otherwise, who will follow us if we tell them to attend the Shakha and we ourselves go to cinema avoiding the Shakha? If no work is carried out by us or no capability reflected, then it means that we are not sincere and honest in our work. Do we really do our work as per expectations? We should not plead lame and petty excuses and avoid the daily routine of the Shakha and keep ourselves away from it. Then our words will not carry any value. Nobody will take us seriously. If we conduct ourselves in such a lazy way and try to talk to the people, they may well reply, “But you do not conduct yourself likewise.” In that case, we have no voice to say anything to them. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary that our conduct must be completely flawless and be true to our words.

Now from this point of view, let us think and ask ourselves whether or not we have become trustworthy of all the people. What then is required for becoming trustworthy? Our life-style must be pure and chaste. Nobody will repose trust and confidence in a person who is impure and unchaste and subject to the prevalent tendency of indulging in undesirable things.  Therefore, we must ensure that our life becomes spotlessly clean. People should feel convinced that every one of our Swayamsevaks is, as an individual, extremely chaste, pious and transparently clean in his character.

The Ideal to be followed: Doctorji

We have before us the ideal of our founding father of Sangh. He was a man of spotlessly clean character. I recollect an incident when Dr. Hedgewar was alive. At that time, an election was held. Two old colleagues of Doctorji, who had later on joined two different parties, contested the election against each other. One of them was closely associated with Doctorji. Hence Doctorji was naturally trying to help his friend in his own informal way. The second contestant was a very powerful speaker. He used to speak from the top of his voice. Thousands of people used to come to listen to his speech because he was adept at hurling choice abuses in a slang and caustic language. Now a day’s, people are used to listening abusive and slang language and without such a spicy and fiery language they do not find the speech interesting enough! Then that leader used to publicly expose in his speech the scandalous affairs in the private lives of his opponent and of his supporters as well. He used to tear them apart in such a way that they would not dare to face the people in their public meetings. He had reduced almost all of his rivals to that sorry situation. In one of his public meetings, he had openly declared that to he would create such a situation that none of his opponents would dare speak in any public meeting in any corner of that town. And he had almost created that situation in reality.

Then Doctorji”s friend also thought of organizing a meeting. Doctorji also Okayed the proposal and accordingly the meeting took place. Some persons present there were bent on disturbing the meeting. Doctorji went to the meeting and sat on the dais. When those people saw the mighty personality of Doctorji present there, nobody dared disturb the meeting. Because they realised that since Dr. Hedgewar was present in the meeting, strength incarnate itself was present there! So, the meeting went off peacefully. That leader said, “What should I say? I tried to expose publicly every scandal of my opponent so that he would have no face to come before the public. But now I see that my opponent is standing on the broad shoulders of “that man against whom I don”t have a single word to utter.” Who would dare say anything against Doctorji? Transparently clean as he was from within and without, what could be said against him? Was there even a single scandal in his life to be exposed? What could that leader do? Such is the glorious example before us. There are many such instances in Doctorji”s life which reflect the supreme confidence that he enjoyed in the hearts of the people.

One more such instance will suffice. One of Doctorji”s friends was in need of money and he came to Doctorji seeking his help. It was a matter of surprise since Doctorji himself hardly had any money. For, Doctorji never practiced medicine as a profession. He used to keep only two medicines with him, one quinine and the other, liniment iodine, for suitable cases! Further, he used to give medicine only to the Swayamsevaks. How then could he get money for his friend? However, Doctorji requested the gentleman to wait and said he would soon arrange for the money.

Doctorji went to some of the rich persons living around him, but as a matter of coincidence nobody was at home. Then he took a tonga and went to the same opposition party leader residing at some distance. At that time, the gentleman concerned was having a chat with his friends. When he saw Doctorji, he said in a light mood, “Welcome Dr. Hedgewar, how come you are here at this time?”, since he had very cordial relations with him. Doctorji told him that he had hardly any time for light, jocular chat and that he had some private work with him. The said gentleman realised that there was some urgent matter. Immediately he went in and Doctorji told him that he wanted five hundred rupees urgently. The gentleman was a bit surprised and asked, “Why? Anybody from your side died or what?” Doctorji replied, let us discuss all those matters later on. Please let me know whether you are able to lend me the amount?”

Thereupon the friend remarked: “You come to ask for money and can I ever refuse? What shall I do with merely keeping money with me”. And immediately he gave Doctorji the required amount. But when Doctorji proposed to give him a promissory note, the leader said, “If people come to know that I have taken such a note from Dr. Hedgewar, they would say, whether I have gone mad! So please take these five hundred rupees. If you want to return them, welcome. If you cannot, please do not worry”.

We must also be able to generate so much of trust and confidence in the hearts of people about ourselves. So much of piety we must possess that the two dangerous vices that might spoil the character i.e., lust and wealth, would not be able to pollute our mind. We must make deliberate attempts so that our mind becomes very pure and unattached to such allurements. It is neither difficult nor impossible. Then only can we become worthy of people”s trust. Then one can go to anybody with confidence. Nobody would also any suspicion as to why we had gone to him. We must create such an atmosphere that the doors of all houses would remain open for us for all 24 hours.

Let us imbibe all these qualities in our life as an ordinary Swayamsevak and perform all those duties with the full awareness of the benefit to our work accruing from all these things, and of the need to carry them out with diligence and effort.

No Fixing of Target of Growth

A question may arise in our mind as to why at all should we do all these things? Somebody may say it is for the growth of the Sangh work. Then somebody may well ask what is meant by the Sangh growth? The Sangh has already grown a lot. Occasionally, its name also figures in the newspapers. So now it is quite enough. Therefore we have to clearly understand as to why we have to grow? What are the aims and objectives before us? It is not our objective to evolve a small organization within the Hindu Society. In fact, our goal is to organize the entire Hindu Society. Now how can this huge society be organized? How is it possible to make all of them attend the Sangh Shakhas? People may ask, is it possible? And in a sense, they are correct. One thing is clear: that our work is restricted to the male part of the society. So, obviously half of the population will not be able to come to the Sangh Shakhas. Then, those who are too young also cannot come, and also those who are very old or physically disabled. Since we have understood all these things before, we have evolved a simple definition and that is, anyone who can come to the Shakha on his own legs or with the help of some one else is a Swayamsevak! So, from our point of view, all such males right from a child to an old person are our potential Swayamsevaks. But, will all such persons also come? Many times we see even this is not feasible. In that case, should we conclude that we will never be able reach our goal. It is obvious; we must have some minimum target before us. Now, what should be that minimum target?

Long ago, our Doctorji had said, “If a certain percentage is achieved, we would have reached a minimum level of organisational growth.” I don”t want to lay down any particular percentage. Because at that time, the percentage was prescribed under a particular situation and now there is likelihood of its misinterpreting it. Once, at a particular place, I also mentioned a particular percentage. As a result, all the workers there set to work enthusiastically as if they were all possessed by that idea. Branches were spread all over. The number of Swayamsevaks was increased everywhere to reach the target. And then I received a letter saying,” We have reached the given target and the expected number of Swayamsevaks are coming to the Shakha. Our work is now completed. So, please let us know what should be done next?” In a humorous style, I wrote back to them stating, “Perform the Pooja in the name of Lord Satyanarayana, listen to the story, distribute Prasad to all and close down the Sangh activities!” Stipulation of a particular percentage is likely to create such misunderstanding!
Then what should be done?

Minimum Level of Work:

When we talk about the duties of an ordinary Swayamsevak, we expect him to establish affectionate and friendly relations with the entire society through the Shakha. Not only in the immediate vicinity of the Shakha but with all those in the surroundings as well. They may be city dwellers or village dwellers or living in deep forests or hills and valleys – all of them are our own fellow brothers in society. So we must have enough numbers of branches, continuously active and spread all over the country with sufficient number of workers required for establishing constant, lively, cordial and healthy relationships of mutual co-operation, trust and confidence with all of them. It is on these lines that we have to think. It is indeed a Herculian task but we have to do it. No less than this should satisfy us. This is the minimum level of growth of work and once that minimum level is attained, we will then have to see to it that it is never allowed to go down.

This is how the mission of life-long work of Sangh is before us. It is on this background, that we must think and ask ourselves, how much has been done at present and how meager it is compared to what is expected of us. And we must also ponder over how much efforts are required to be done even as an ordinary Swayamsevak. Any negligence or avoidance in this respect is unfair and unbecoming of us. With this thought in our mind, let us re-arrange the priorities in our life and let every one of us come forward to work according to expectations and with the best of our capabilities.

Our Mission

Why all this urgency? The reason is obvious: The sorrowful condition of our Hindu society is there before us. It has forgotten its national identity. We have lost courage of conviction of calling our country, our nation as our own. Our love for the motherland appears to have been weakened. As a result, selfishness has become rampant in our society, coupled with the growth of vices, groupism, unethical behaviour and vying with each other. It looks as though the whole society is getting disintegrated.

In addition, many enemies have also infiltrated into our country. They are not leaving out any opportunity to disintegrate and destroy our society, and help their internal agents here. They are also standing on all sides of our boundary and nobody knows when they might attack. Further, vices such as mutual quarrels and feuds, lack of character, self-forgetfulness prevalent everywhere may well lead us to anarchy. If our internal fragmented situation further continues, we may lose our ability to resist the aggression of all these enemies when they attack.

If we take all these things into consideration, there is only one answer before us. Complaining or whining is not the answer. Should we keep on complaining or stand up much stronger than the enemies? What should a virtuous, self-respecting and valiant nation do? Should it just complain? Should we merely scream that other people are attacking us? They are bound to attack so long as we are weak and offer them a favourable situation.

Then, what is our duty? The forgetfulness of our national identity needs to be overcome. We have to arouse a feeling in everybody”s heart that it is his motherland, his nation, that the entire society is his and that the nation must be made mighty, self-respecting, confident and glorious in the galaxy of all nations. On the basis of this awakening and on the strength of our noble conduct we will have to infuse our society with the supreme confidence, that we will certainly organise our society from the Himalayas to Kanyakumari as a well disciplined and powerful entity and make our nation capable of overcoming all sorts of calamities. There is no alternative to this. All other ways are cursory, shallow and outwardly. We have to cleanse the society from inside by purging all the dirt accumulated so far and purifying it so that its vast latent vitality is fully roused to action.

This is the mission of R.S.S. And there is no substitute to this. Be assured, that by the Grace of God, we are destined to fulfill this mission and we as ordinary Swayamsevaks, are the missionaries of this great mission, in fact, this is an exceptionally great honour and recognition that we are bestowed upon. Keeping this keen awareness ever awake in our mind, we must set to work forthwith. We have to broaden the base of Sangh activities by dedicating all our strength, intellect and time of every one of us and that too within the shortest possible period of time.

” It is a matter of great pride and prestige that due to divine coincidence. I have been a Sangh Swayamsevak. This is only thing worth of pride “

Exposing the Entrenched Gang at Wikipedia

Twitter thread by @Soumyadipta

Years ago, my friend and I collaborated to write an investigative article on Wikipedia.
The plan was to expose the entrenched gang of Wikipedia editors who earn money by creating and editing Wikipedia pages.

A Bollywood producer helped me with the contact of an agency. The plan was to pose as the PR agency of a relatively unknown actress and create a wiki page as per our instructions on email.

We will have email instructions predating the edits and then invoices of payments. So we will be able to prove that Wikipedia India is corrupt .  Our plan got changed along the way because we realised that Wikipedia relies heavily on publicly available news links and without them it is impossible to edit a page.
So, it was decided to remove unwanted edits from the newly created page and keep only the favourable edits.  As decided, we paid 10K to an agency to create a page of a male actor. Both me and my friend shared the amount.
The total cost of creating and keeping the page for six months was 50K.

The agency demanded an annual contract of 30K for keeping the page up and purge unwanted edits. 

We learnt that Wikipedia is a deceptive place. Nobody can go and edit a page as they like. You can edit a page but “they” reverse your edits if they don’t like them.

A gang of about 50 Indian editors are on top of a chain of editors and they have complete control over Wikipedia . The top 50 editors are mostly from IT companies with much free time on their hands and they are on Wiki the whole day.

They are on top of a chain of command. A team consists of about 10 editors. A newbie proposes an edit and a chain of command approves it and further edits it. 

The top editors are all anonymous and have enormous power because Google algorithm always rewards Wikipedia as the top page on Search.

Google changes its algorithm frequently but they used to heavily favour Wiki because it is an open source, publicly edited charity platform. 

Wikipedia gets its reflected glory from Google which translates into business for these editors

Here’s a payment structure for these Wiki editors in the command chain:
1. Top Editor: 30% (one)
2. Senior editor: 25%
3. Mid editor: 15%
4. Young editor: 10%
5. Agency: 20% 

For 2 months we kept on adding favourable edits to a page based on frivolous press releases.
Anybody working with Bollywood actors know about such PR hangouts which contain favourable but innocuous information, like the news of an unknown award or bring a youth icon etc 

Some flop films were turned into average or semi-hits at the box office.
All the information edited were complimentary & showed the page in good light.
Every time the top editors approved the edits and they were never reversed.
Even if somebody reversed it, they were brought back 

We got a lot of info.

1. The top editors make about 5 lakhs every month as “consultants”.
2. The agencies make about 3 lakh per month.
3. Students are enrolled as interns and may later on become mid-level editors.
Wikipedia is a big business opportunity, hence tightly controlled 

The Wikipedia editors ensure that all money is properly accounted for and it is electronically transferred. Tax is paid on the income as consultants.
But nowhere do they mention Wikipedia anywhere.
It’s all projected as IT related consultation of an Ad agency or a PR agency. 

Intermission: Will come back soon to update this thread. 

There is a major difference between media & Wikipedia. Here most editors mask their identity. So, it’s difficult to figure who’s attacking you. You might be a professor with a PhD on the subject but a first year student will reverse your edits if he’s higher in the hierarchy 

How does a Wiki editor climb up the ladder?

Ans: It takes years to climb up the hierarchy.

Wikipedia gives you badges, stars etc in recognition of your work.

You won’t get promotions unless you have the tacit support of the “gang”

There is a very well-known process here 

To climb up the hierarchy on Wikipedia, your edits needs to “stick”.

If your edits get reversed or deleted frequently then Wikipedia understands that you are not a talent.

This is the game that is played on the platform.

If they want you out, they will reverse your edits. 

Picture this: You do a lot of research to edit a page on Wikipedia.

Backed with data, you edit the article on Wikipedia only to find that it has been reversed the next day.

Imagine this happening to you frequently. Day after day.

You get frustrated and angry.


This is the why new editors have left Wikipedia out of frustration.

What is the point of research and editing articles if they get deleted?

Wikipedia has a system where you can “Talk” to your “seniors” about why your edits have disappeared.

This is where the bullying happens. 

There are these “Talk” pages where you can ask why your edits have been deleted. These pages are public and the language is monitored.

It is here that the senior editors will bully you by clever usage of words.

They’ll tell you that your edits were “pretty pointless” or “vague” 

You have the liberty of re-editing or seeking help from someone else but the bullies who are trying to block your edits, will patrol your Talk pages to figure out who you are talking to and what are you saying.
If they find you intimidating, they will try to block you permanently 

As Wikipedia attaches a lot of importance to citations, they attack your citations from publicly available sources.

These editors ensure by one method or the other that their narrative on a particular page does not change.

This is mainly the case with political pages. 

It’s interesting to note that there are many Bengali and Malayali senior editors on Wikipedia who have been editing Wikipedia pages for years.

They’re staunch Leftists and their job is ensure that Wikipedia doesn’t say nice things about non-left personalities and media 

How do they vilify pages? Well that’s another interesting thing.

For personalities, they will highlight their flaws.

For example, create a separate section for an unverified allegation levelled against him just by citing a newspaper report.

But for others, they would ignore it 

For people who are known to have anti-left views, the attacks get more vicious.

They scour the internet for publicly available articles that show you in bad light. Once they get such an article, a new editor will edit and the senior editors will ensure that it sticks to the page 

It’s interesting how they organise the malicious edits.

They will form a team. Usually such teams are formed on secret chat rooms outside of Wikipedia.

They will ensure that the edits come from different locations. So it’s impossible to figure out that it’s a coordinated attack 

If seniors from Virginia, Kolkata, Vietnam, Karachi & Mumbai are saying the same thing about an article, then the edit sticks. No matter how much you try, you will not be able to modify it.
Everytime new senior editors will come and block you from editing or will reverse the edit 

I could never write the article & had to leave it half way.

* The actor didn’t give us written consent
* My friend quit because the agency was asking for more money
* The editor didn’t sound too excited either 

I witnessed a positive change in the actor’s online profile as Enthusiastic Wiki editors added more information and expanded the Wiki page.
His Twitter profile got verified as Twitter apparently considers Wikipedia as a credible signal to decide if an user should be verified 

I noticed a dramatic shift in the online presence of the actor. He became more active on social media & hired a PR firm to plant stories about him in the media. By this time, he has understood that if mainstream media publishes anything, Wiki editors will include it on Wiki page. 

I understood the enormous clout of Wikipedia in establishing an online image as it is the 1st page on Google search.
This Wikipedia page makes or breaks your online image.
So, I continued my research on the side about how editors rise up the ladder to the top of the command chain 

Editors start off with pages that align with their core interests (pages on cricket, medicine, IT).
Then they go on to create pages of an ongoing news: Like #CoronaOutbreak.
These pages are factual and aren’t controversial. But they establish you as an editor whose edits stick. 

Wikipedia seniors notice your contributions and start participating on your TALK pages, guiding you and basically trying to figure out who you are and what you are. 90% of these editors are anonymous. Wikipedia knows your IP address and maintains the log of every activity. 

After a few months, you start gaining more “rights” on Wikipedia. In an year or so, you become an important member of the community. You have also made friends with seniors and they consider you a friendly. This is time.
Now you turn your sights on the controversial pages. 

This is the time to start vandalising the pages of personalities that you don’t like. It can be a film star or a director or a political activist.
Usually the A-listers are protected. Like you cannot vandalise Narendra Modi’s page or Shah Rukh Khan’s page.
The seniors won’t allow 

Here are the usual victims of the Wiki editor mafia:
1. Moderately famous personalities including politicians and people with strong political views
2. New Media houses (Like @OpIndia_com)
3. Bollywood actors
4. Communal events (#DelhiRiots)
5. Terms (eg Hindutva or #JaiShriRam

As I said, Wikipedia editors come from various backgrounds but most of the seniors have a strong bias against anti-left narrative.

BJP leaders, personalities who publicly support Narendra Modi and those who speak in favour of majority Hindus often have derogatory edits approved. 

Please remember: My study pertained to Indian Wikipedia pages only. But the same pattern is seen across Wikipedia.

Wikipedia Editing is actually a game of citations from publicly available sources. The hidden cheat sheet is approving the citations that align with your narrative. 

Wikipedia is aware of this and has installed checks & balances to prevent biased behaviour among its editors. Example: There are Arbitration Forums where you can confront senior editors and any matter may be escalated to the top editors: The Moderators
Let me talk about them now. 

The Moderators are people who have the final say in Talk pages about what edits would stick and what wouldn’t.

Then there are Administrators who are like an Editor-in-Chief of a Media house. They have ultimate powers.
Currently there are 1,144 administrators of English Wikipedia 

There is documented proof about how a Wikipedia Moderator was a corrupt person.

Wikipedia had to ban the user because it was proven that he was running a mafia syndicate to favour a business house.

Wikipedia apologised after the user was outed.

The obvious question is: what are Wikipedia bosses doing about this?

The answer is: Nothing! They can’t digest the fact that their creation is slowly becoming a monster and has started altering history and promoting biased narratives.
Like a mother who thinks her son is the best!
Not many know that Wikipedia has carefully added a disclaimer admitting that their platform is biased!
Wikipedia also goes on to justify how and where the bias creeps in. But they are silent about what mechanisms they are installing to stop that bias.

Not only does ideological bias and bullying exist on Wikipedia. There has been many cases of sexual harassment and targeted gender harassment on Wikipedia. Female editors have been harassed by the gangs of male editors. Here is a documented case from 2015.

The problem with Wikipedia is: They do nothing about the ills that exist on their platform. Though Wikipedia’s founder Jimmy Wales continuously defends Wikipedia and says how great the platform is.
Co-Founder Larry Sanger has gone on record about Wikipedia’s biased narrative
A proponent of neutrality and a PhD in Philosophy, Sanger worked with Jimmy to found Wikipedia in 2001. He has left Wiki because he didn’t approve of the way Wikipedia was evolving. Again Jimmy Wales did nothing to correct course.
Jimmy doesn’t listen.

A prominent criticism of Wiki is its gender gap and unfair targeting of women public figures, eg, women of colour.

Here’s a case study of how a scientist’s page kept on disappearing from Wikipedia and the battle to restore it. There are many such cases.

Wikipedia has done nothing to check their platform of biases that come in many forms: political narrative, gender, historical perspective, religion etc

Most complaints have emerged from Jimmy Wales’ own country.
But he has always praised his creation.

Jimmy Wales


The complex wheels of Wikipedia grind very slowly. It is effectively the opposite of twitter in this regard. Twitter is therefore prone to angry mobs and extreme disinformation. Wikipedia can make mistakes, of course. But it is a very different environment from social media.

Its been a long thread. Thanks for reading, discussing and posting it on your timeline.

Please add your experiences in the comments section if you are (were) a Wikipedia editor.

Please ask Wikipedia to be neutral or else they are doing a disservice to humanity.

Thread closed 

Tilak and his Joke on ‘Original Home of the Aryas’

The Arctic Home -deliberate joke by Tilak.

Lokamanya Tilak’s book  “The Arctic Home of the Vedas” was long regarded by many of his
readers as an attempt to establish the theory of  Aryan migration from the Arctic Regions (still further north) into India.

But, subsequently, he himself declared that wonderful book of his to have been a deliberately planned and farcical parody of, and counterblast to, the Orientalists’ Central Asian theory, couched in such terms as to carry an air of the utmost seriousness. In fact, he used to say that, like an actor who played his part too well on the stage and produced on the minds of his spectators and hearers the Illusion of Reality, he had overshot his mark and made all his readers take him too seriously and that he meant, in course of time, to demolish his owVn arguments in a new book to be called the “Antarctic Home of the Vedas” and prove
the whole thing to have been a mere farcical fooling of the Orientalists’ methods ! But, unluckily, Indian Nationalist Politics and the Valentine Chirol case and other such pre-occupations stood in the way of and prevented his fulfilling that intention of his, and then Death prematurely
intervened and robbed the world of the pleasure and the fun promised.

Extract from “Secret of India’s Greatness by Jagadguru Sri Bharati Krishna Tirtha .

The book can be bought here


The Wall Street Journal Peddles Fake News on Riots in Delhi

Prasar Bharati News Service Breaking : 

Police complaints filed against The Wall Street Journal & Maharashtra Police for “defaming particular religion & spreading communal tension” with respect to alleged misreporting on #DelhiViolence & murder of IB official Ankit Sharma.



Wall Street Journal had quoted Ankit’s brother Ankur as having said that Ankit was killed by a mob chanting ‘Jai Shri Ram’.


In conversation with PBNS, Ankur Sharma, Brother of killed IB official discredited

report, “I never gave such a statement to Wall Street Journal. This is a ploy to defame my brother and my family. Wall Street Journal is lying.”