The 4 Myths on Jammu and Kashmir

We all know that there is a problem of Naxalism in Chhattisgarh. Do we call it a
Chattisgarh Problem” ? Bihar has poverty and backwardness. Do we call it a “Bihar
Problem” ? Then why do we call the problem of “Terrorism” and “Separatism” in the
state of Jammu and Kashmir as ‘Kashmir Problem’ ???

The ‘Kashmir Problem’ is a myth that was created by separatists, Jammu and Kashmir
politicians and Union Governments to protect their vested interests. Non-existent
‘Kashmir Problem’ was created and people were made to believe that the whole state
has some problem and the ‘accession is conditional’ and so on…

Two of the three regions of today’s Jammu and Kashmir have NO problem. 86,000 sq.km area of the state out of 1,01,000 sq.km has no problem. It’s only the small area of Kashmir valley, i.e 15,000 sq.km only, that has a problem of “Terrorism” and “Separatism”. 

Where exactly is the problem of “Separatism” ?

Only in the small 15% Muslim majority region of Kashmir valley and not in the Hindu and Buddhist majority 85% area of the rest of the state. There has never been a protest against India in Jammu or Ladakh.

JK

In summary, it is “Dilli Problem” – created by Dilli, nurtured by Dilli and carried on by Dilli. It actually refers to the bureaucrats, politicians and the so-called jammu and Kashmir experts based out of Dilli. Whenever the Nationalists become stronger and there is light at the end of the tunnel visible for all the problems, Dilli does something stupid giving morale boost to the separatists of Jammu and Kashmir.

When Nationalists were trying to integrate the state fully, Indian government sent three interlocutors, which gave a huge morale boost to the tiny group of separatists. The interlocutors report suggested to review all the Constitutional articles that got extended to Jammu and Kashmir since 1953. In reality, the need was to extend all the pending Constitution articles, not to review or remove any that is already extended. They even recommended the permanency of Article 370, with ‘special status’ via Article 371, acceptance of sovereignty of PoKJ on the areas illegally occupied by Pakistan.

The 4 Myths on Jammu and Kashmir:

1) Myth of Separatism: Everyone think of J&K as a separatist and anti-Indian state.
This is a wrong notion. Separatists are active only in Kashmir. Kashmir is the
smallest region of the state with a Muslim-majority (85% of area of J&K state is
Hindu and Buddhist majority). All the separatist leaders are from a single community
– Kashmiri speaking Sunni Muslims. All the other communities including Gujjar, Pahadi and Shia Muslims are fighting against the separatism and so-called alienation.

2) Myth of Dispute (so called ‘Disputed state’): There is a big confusion about merger of J&K with India even in the minds of the senior leaders of our nation. Raja Hari Singh of
J&K signed a document of accession which was the standard format used for the
accession of all the other Princely states with India. This was unconditional. The
only document which talks about asking the wishes of people is a letter from Lord
Mountbatten – this is not a collateral document and hence not legally substantial. On
6th February 1954, the J&K Constituent Assembly (duly elected by people of J&K)
ratified the accession of J&K to India. Hence, legally and constitutionally, J&K is
an integral part of J&K India.

3) Myth of Plebiscite: There is a general belief among intellectuals of India that we
have committed for a plebiscite in UN. There is no such commitment. India complained on 1st January 1948 to UN Security Council under UN Charter 35 to force Pakistan to withdraw their aggression from our lands. In 1958, UN Security Council proposed a resolution which called for unconditional withdrawal of Pakistan forces from POK, disbanding of AJK government, extension of J&K Government to AJK, resettling all the Indians who were forced to leave AJK, India to move required number of forces and J&K Government to conduct plebiscite under the supervision of UN Plebiscite Commissioner. Pakistan did not agree and act upon this UN proposal; hence there is no need for India to carry on any plebiscite.

4) Myth of Autonomy (so called ‘Special status’): The only purpose of Article 370 is to “extend the Union Constitution” to J&K. It neither gives special status nor guarantees
autonomy for J&K. The heading of Article itself says it is temporary and this needs
to be repealed. It was only a political fraud to keep the so-called Kashmir
separatism alive.

Till now in 2013, only around 260 articles of the India constitution have been
extended into Jammu and Kashmir state. India Constitution in total contains 444
articles in 22 parts, 12 schedules and 118 amendments. Incidentally, India has the
world’s longest Constitution ever written by any sovereign nation in the history of
mankind!

jk-map

Why is “Gligit Baltistan” so strategically important?
Gilgit is the place where 6 Nations meet – India, China, Pakistan, Afghanistan,
Tazikistan and Tibet. Pakistan occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK) is composed of Gilgit
-Baltistan Region and Muzaffarabad and Mirpur divisions of the former Princely State
of Jammu & Kashmir.

GB1

This northern area of Jammu and Kashmir state, had borders with Pakistan,
Afghanistan, Tajikistan (close enough), China (Xinjiang) and Tibet (now China
occupied). With this one region, India could have border even today with three
nations practically, plus Tajikistan of erst while Soviet Union only being 25 KMs
away. (Source: http://www.jammukashmirnow.org/pok/facts-about-gb/)

VK Menon Speech In Security Council (Longest speech ever in UN history):
Mr. V. K. Krishna Menon’s Marathon Speech Lasting For 8 Hours on Jammu and Kashmir at the United Nations Security Council’s Seven Hundred And Sixty Second Meeting On 23rd January 1957. (Source: http://www.jammukashmirnow.org/jammu-kashmir-in-un/vk-menon-speech-in-security-council/)

Jawaharlal Nehru’s meek surrender to Sheikh Abdullah:

A massive agitation called “Praja Parishad Andolan” (People’s Council Movement
started in Jammu and Kashmir when Jawaharlal Nehru surrendered to Sheikh Abdullah’s demands – namely, separate flag, separate constituion, separate dominion, no Indian election commission, no CAG, no Indian Administration Serive, no parliament election and even the Governor could not be appointed by the President of India like in other states. The denominations of Chief Minister (Mukhya Mantri) and Governor (Rajyapal) won’t be applicable in Jammu and Kashmir. Instead they are called “Wazir-e-Azam” (Prime Minister) and “Sadr-r-Riyasat” (President).

The current year 2013 marks 60th anniversary of “Praja Parishad Andolan”. 17th
November 1952 was the starting point of the final phase of the agitation under Pandit
Premnath Dogra. Initially, he was the RSS Sanghchalak of State of Jammu and Kashmir
and at that time president of main opposition party, Praja Parishad. The movement’s
slogan was that One nation cannot have Two Prime Ministers, Two Flags and Two
Constitutions (“Ek desh mein do Vidhan, do Pradhan aur Do Nishan nahi challengeA single country can’t have two constitutions, two prime ministers, and two National Emblems).

Majority of ordinary Indians are emotionally attached to J&K and want it as an integral part of Bharat. Most of the intellectuals in India are in a defeatist mood and suggest that we should leave Kashmir and move on. The year 2013 is the year of Bharat in J&K. We had two such situations earlier as well when the J&K could have been easily integrated with Bharat. The first was in 1947 when there was no sense of alienation and we could have extended the entire Indian constitution to J&K. The second time was in 1971 when 94,000 Pakistani troops surrendered to Indian Army and the Kashmiris were disillusioned with Pakistan. The political leadership of India failed to capitalize both these occasions.

The separatists have understood that India will never leave Jammu and Kashmir as it is a legal territory of India. Guns won’t work against India even after 40,000 terrorists and 35,000 civilians killed, and also about 6000 security forces martyred. 85,000 AK47 rifles, telescopic guns, pistols and rocket launchers and tons of RDX have been seized. Hence, there is no solution to the separatism problem by waging a war on India, be it direct or proxy via terrorism.

Today, terrorism in Kashmir is in its final days and there is no live support structure for terrorists in J&K. Separatists have learned three important things:-

1) India would not give up J&K. If they want to live in J&K, they have to live in India.

2) India cannot be defeated or made to bow down through arms struggle.

3) Nationalists of J&K cannot be taken for granted. Amarnath agitation was the turning point in the struggle between Nationalist and Separatist forces.

The need of the hour for all us Nationalists is to bring about awareness and change in our mindset – from “J&K bachao (save) to “J&K apnao (adopt)Visit Jammu and Kashmir atleast three times in a lifetime – once visit Ladakh, once Jammu and once Kashmir. Contact Jammu Kashmir Study Center for a customised itinerary.

Jai BhArat.

PS: Watch these videos for more understanding of the History of Jammu and Kashmir and Accession topic:

Part-1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWQByoyEtQU

Part-2http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfQh1dg07-I

Part-3http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjLBcIr22So

Part-4http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6GxvgYrhMg

Part-5http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cOQR1G8WyY

Relentless RSS continues to safeguard Jammu and Kashmir:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q244KiwrNN0

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “The 4 Myths on Jammu and Kashmir

  1. Pingback: United Nations Resolution on Jammu & Kashmir | Arise Bharat

  2. ÑjR fÆ'xĀñ

    Ohhh! Really…
    Do You Know Better Than Wikipedia….
    And Listen Idiot,,, In Kashmir There Are 67% Muslims and in Jammu There Are 31% Muslims….
    And in Average J&K is The Muslim Majority State….
    And now Tell Me who The Hell You’re Too Decide The Fate of J&K ….
    Kashmir Belongs To Kashmiri’s (Irrespective of Religion)….
    And We Will Decide Whom With We Want To Be A Part….
    .
    .
    And If You Have The Guts To Know What Number Of People Want Freedom Here….. Just Hold a Referendum…. And Then See!!!!
    Ok…. So Keep Your Nose Out Of These Topics….
    I Dun Give a Fuck To Whom Kashmir was a Part And is a Part…..
    And The Use Of Force On Kashmir Doesn’t Prooves We Want To Be Part Of India….
    OK?????
    Now Jus Rethink And ……. Don’t Forget To View These Topics On Wikipedia…..

    Reply
  3. adhyaya

    THE TRUTH ABOUT ARTICLE 370
    Posted on September 12, 2014 by François Gautier | 4 Comments
    Source: http://francoisgautier.me/2014/09/12/the-truth-about-article-370/

    Politicians have been talking endlessly about Article 370, but many Indians still do not understand what it practically means. It was drafted by Gopalaswami Ayyangar, Minister without portfolio in the first Union Cabinet of Nehru who felt that JK was not yet ripe for integration. Sardar Patel was so livid with the provisions of Article 370 that he had resigned on this issue.

    WHAT DOES ARTICLE 370 IMPLY?
    ———————-
    The state’s residents live under a separate set of laws, including those related to citizenship, ownership of property, and fundamental rights, as compared to other Indians.
    * Unlike other State legislative Assemblies, J&K legislature has a six-year term.
    * Jammu & Kashmir has two flags; a separate State flag along with the National Flag.
    * Insulting of national symbols is not cognizable offence in Jammu & Kashmir.

    * Most of the laws except defence, foreign affairs, finance and communication, passed by Indian Parliament need to be approved by the State Government before they are made applicable in the State.

    * The citizens of J&K are governed by State-specific laws which come under the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, instead of those for the rest of India.

    * Under Article 370 the Indian Parliament cannot increase or reduce the borders of the State.
    * The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction in the State of Jammu & Kashmir.

    * The residents of J&K enjoy dual citizenship, but they could loose the J&K citizenship if they marry residents of other States.

    * If a woman marries a man in other Indian States, she loses her citizenship. Whereas if any woman marries a Pakistani, she will be entitled to have a citizenship of Jammu & Kashmir.

    * The Article also gives Pakistan’s citizens entitlement to Indian citizenship, if he marries a Kashmiri girl.

    * Majority of Indian laws including RTE, RTI and the writ of agencies like CBI, CAG are not applicable in J&K.

    * No outsider can purchase land in the State.

    * The Centre has no power to declare financial emergency under Article 360 in the State. It can declare emergency in the state only in case of war or external aggression.

    This is what Ambedkar said about Article 370: “‘”You wish India should protect your borders, she should build roads in your area, she should supply you foodgrains, and Kashmir should get equal status as India. But Government of India should have only limited powers and Indian people should have no rights in Kashmir. To give consent to this proposal, would be a treacherous thing against the interests of India and I, as the Law Minister of India, will never do it.”

    Reply
  4. nparamasivam1951

    I want to know, (1) What is Art. 370 (2) Whether it is relevant now (3) What is the problem in repealing it, if it is sumbling block to J&K devlopment (4) Why it cannot be divided into 3 states for making it easy for developing those areas with Nationalist mind?

    Reply
  5. vidyadhara buddhiraju

    While it is fair to observe that a “legally” valid instrument of accession exists for merging the Kashmir state with India, this is not in reality the actual basis of merger of the state with the Indian Union. The unity of India is eternal. The instrument of accession is a formality invented by the British while they were leaving India. Whatever is united and enforced by the will of the Hindus is ultimately and legitimately Hindustan. Whether or not an instrument of accession was written. We must not confuse formality with reality. And most importantly of all we must not subordinate the essential fact of the Hindu national will to a formality invented by the British.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s